News
Signal is a much better messaging app compared to Whatsapp, so why are we all still using Meta's inferior product?
According to a memo sent to all House members on Monday, WhatsApp was deemed as ‘high risk’ due to ‘potential security risks ...
Signal is a nonprofit and open-source platform, whereas WhatsApp has benefited from Meta’s resources and marketing muscle (advantages that aid in user growth but can also prompt suspicions).
12d
GB News on MSNSignal promises 'no AI clutter, no surveillance ads' as it slams controversial WhatsApp shake-upSignal, the encrypted messenger funded to the tune of $50 million by the co-creator of WhatsApp, has promised to never ...
Approved products in the US House of Representatives include Microsoft Teams, Signal, Apple’s iMessage and FaceTime, and ...
Signal president Meredith Whittaker has mocked WhatsApp over ads, reaffirming commitment to privacy without "AI clutter". In a post on X, she has publicly criticised WhatsApp's decision to display ...
Everyone talks about how hard it is to leave iMessage. But with WhatsApp, it's not even about the app — it's about your people.
13d
India Today on MSNNo WhatsApp on phones? After Iran, US govt now tells staff to delete WhatsApp due to security riskThe US House of Representatives has banned WhatsApp from staff devices, citing security concerns. Staff are instructed to switch to apps like Signal, Wickr or Microsoft Teams instead.
Signal and WhatsApp have long competed to attract encryption-minded users. Meta’s promises that its new WhatsApp ad features would be implemented “in the most privacy-oriented way possible ...
WhatsApp banned on US government devices over security concerns, despite Meta defending its encryption; other apps like ...
This is especially risky in spaces where people feel psychologically safe. Whereas users are typically wary of TV advertising ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results