Trump secured court victories across immigration, trade, and federal workforce cases, as appeals courts and the Supreme Court granted emergency relief measures.

The justices stated that under federal law, there is no distinction between “discrimination” and “reverse discrimination.” It’s all illegal and subject to the same standards.

The age-old debate over the enforceability of employment bonds has resurfaced with the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in ...

In February 2024, the Supreme Court increased the sentence of Hamza Dahla from 3 years in prison to 7 years for collecting ...

The U.S. Supreme Court sided with an Ohio woman who claimed to be the victim of reverse discrimination because she is ...

Daltonganj: The Palamu administration would recruit 585 Grade-IV employees by August 9, in accordance with the directive issued by the Supreme Court i.

Johnson v. NCAA could be a clarifying win for the organization on employment, or it could be the case that hastens dramatic ...

An epochal moment in the movement occurred on June 27th, 1969, when LGBTQ patrons of the Stonewall Inn in New York City ...

Former Unima French Lecturer takes government to international court over 20-year legal ordeal Malawi 24 | Latest News from ...

The primary purpose of a mutual termination or resignation agreement is to prevent the employee from pursuing reinstatement ...