News
In a career-spanning interview, the Oscar-winning auteur also reflects on Ewan McGregor shaving his "incredible hair" before ...
Director Danny Boyle has told JOE in a new interview that he is "sure" that he will get to complete a new 28 Years Later trilogy of films.
That's right—there are plans not only for one sequel to 28 Years Later, but a second, making this entire endeavor a super ambitious, genre-bending horror-thriller trilogy.. The third film ...
"28 Years Later" leaves the story open for its sequel, "The Bone Temple," which is due out in 2026. The ending sees Spike (Alfie Williams) meet a strange new group of survivors. Horror fans rejoice, ...
Danny Boyle Is Planning A Whole 28 Years Later Trilogy – Here's Everything He's Said So Far. ... The sequel, 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, is expected to arrive on 16 January 2026.
Kipling’s poem was first published in 1903 and was intended to capture the monotony of soldiers marching in war, while the ...
Filmmakers Danny Boyle and Alex Garland break down 28 Years Later's twisted conclusion, what it means for the planned sequels, and how much of Cillian Murphy's Jim we'll see in the rest of the trilogy ...
More than two decades after the zombie film 28 Days Later was released, a sequel is ... a sequel, titled 28 Years Later. Ad. ... and Garland were planning to launch a new trilogy in the 28 ...
28 Years Later ends on a cliffhanger—making way for a sequel and the start of a new trilogy. Here's what we know about Danny Boyle and Alex Garland's project. '28 Years Later' Will Have a Sequel.
With a sequel, 28 Years Later Part II: The Bone Temple already in the works from Candyman director Nia DaCosta, the movie is anticipated to start a new trilogy. MORE ABOUT. Cillian Murphy.
With DaCosta stepping into Boyle’s shoes for this sequel – technically the fourth film in the franchise – it was shot back-to-back with 28 Years Later. Therefore, filming has already wrapped ...
That sequel is all but disavowed in the franchise’s latest installment, 28 Years Later. There’s one dismissive, drive-by reference to the events of that film, but then it’s just swept aside ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results